Repository of Reports on Geologic and Cosmic Evidence

for Downfall of Big Bang and New Cosmic Model of the Universe


  1. Gentry, R. V. 2011. "Big Bang Titanic: New Dark Energy (Vacuum Gravity) Cosmic Model Emerges Upon Falsification of The Big Bang By Disproof of Its Central Assumptions." APS April Meeting 2011, Session K1: Poster Session II (May 1). JPG in HTML

    Abstract:   Physicists who identify the big bang with the early universe should have first noted from Hawking's A Brief History of Time, p. 42, that he ties Hubble's law to Doppler shifts from galaxy recession from a nearby center, not to big bang's unvalidated and thus problematical expansion redshifts. Our PRL submission LJ12135 describes such a model, but in it Hubble's law is due to Doppler and vacuum gravity effects, the 2.73K CBR is vacuum gravity shifted blackbody cavity radiation from an outer galactic shell, and its (1 + z)−1 dilation and (M,z) relations closely fit high-z SNe Ia data; all this strongly implies our model's vacuum energy is the elusive dark energy. We also find GPS operation's GR effects falsify big bang's in-flight expansion redshift paradigm, and hence the big bang, by showing λ changes occur only at emission. Surprisingly we also discover big bang's CBR prediction is T < 2×10−8 K, not the observed 2.73K. So instead of the 2.73K affirming the big bang as cosmologists claim, it actually disproves it, to which the DAE's response is most enigmatic — namely, CBR photons expand dλ/dt > 0, while galactic photons shrink dλ/dt < 0. Contrary to a PRL editor's claim, the above results show LJ12135 fits PRL guidelines for papers that replace established theories. For details see

    Video Promo:   High quality video stream requiring video player capable of playing QuickTime video files and good internet connection. Length: 14:42. MOV QuickTime File

  2. Gentry, R. V. 2011. Hawking's A Briefer History of Time's No-God-Universe disproven by primordial 218Po halos embedded in granite rocks, which proves their rapid creation due to 218Po's 3 min t1/2, something only the God of Genesis could have done." APS April Meeting 2011, Session S1: Poster Session III (May 2). JPG in HTML

    Abstract:   Quotes from my Science (184, 62, 1974) report, "Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective," show why primordial polonium halos earlier commanded attention for creation, "It is also apparent that Po halos do pose contradictions to currently held views of Earth history" ... "For example, there is first the problem of how isotopic separation of several Po isotopes (or their β-decay precursors) could have occurred naturally. Second, a straightforward explanation of 218Po halos implies that the 1-μm radiocenters of very dark halos of this type initially contained as many as 5 × 109 atoms (a concentration of more than 50 percent) of the isotope 218Po (half-life, 3 minutes), a problem that almost defies reason. A further necessary consequence, that such Po halos could have formed only if the host rocks underwent a rapid crystallization, renders exceedingly difficult, in my estimation, the prospect of explaining these halos by physical laws as presently understood." In 1977 E. P. Wigner, G. N. Flerov (Dubna), Ed Anders, E. Segre, F. Dyson, and John Wheeler all commented on these results (see Also, 14N detection in dwarf radiohalos may be of cosmological significance in implying a superheavy element origin from 14C emission.

    Video Promo:   High quality video stream requiring video player capable of playing QuickTime video files and good internet connection. Length: 28:53. Actual sound and video starts at 1:10. MOV QuickTime File

U.T. Geology Professor Says Granite Synthesis Only Takes One Week

  • In 1987, Dr. Gentry gave a public presentation at the University of Tennessee. In an interchange during that presentation, geology professor Dr. Larry Taylor asserted that granite synthesis only takes one week. The video of that interchange can be seen in this 22 minute excerpt from that presentation. WMV

  • "Should Creation Science Be Taught at the University of Tennessee?" The video of the entire 1987 University of Tennessee presentation, lasting 2 hours and 40 minutes, can be seen here. WMV

Dr. Brent Dalrymple's Response to the Scientific Evidence for Creation

  • Dr. Brent Dalrymple's testimony at the 1981 Arkansas Creation Trial. HTML

  • Dr. Brent Dalrymple to AGU Members, November 1992.   Dr. Brent Dalrymple sent out letters on National Center for Science Education (NCSE) letterhead, soliciting both members and donations for the NCSE. Part of his appeal was based on the fact that no one would really know how to answer the claim "that the presence of Polonium halos in granite demonstrates that granite had to have formed suddenly (i.e., was specially created)." HTML

  • Dr. Brent Dalrymple to Fellow Geologists, November 1995.   This letter is essentially a repeat of Dr. Dalrymple's 1995 letter. It likewise mentions the unrefuted claim of the Polonium halo evidence, indicating that three years of additional research by evolutionists had still turned up absolutely nothing. HTML

National Press Club Release

  • The Orion Foundation, 2010. "Big Bang Cosmic Titanic: The Opening Salvo in the Resurgence of Scientific Genesis." National Press Club event, February 16, 2010. PDF

    Synopsis:   On February 16, 2010, from 8:30a — 11:00a in the Zenger Room of the National Press Club, creation scientist Robert Gentry brought to public attention the scientific community's censorship of his overthrow of big bang cosmology by disproof of its central assumption, as reported in his 2/16/10 American Physical Society poster at the DC Marriott Wardman Park Hotel.


  1. Gentry, R.V. 1977. "Mystery of the Radiohalos." Research Communications NETWORK, Breakthrough Report, February 10, 1977. PDF

  2. Gentry, R.V. 1974. "Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Science 184, 62. PDF

  3. Gentry, R.V. et al. 1974. "'Spectacle' Array of Po-210 Halo Radiocentres in Biotite: A Nuclear Geophysical Enigma." Nature 252, 564. HTML

  4. Gentry, R. V. 2003. "Discovery of a Major Contradiction in Big Bang Cosmology Points to the New Cosmic Center Universe Model." CERN Preprint, Ext-2003-021. PDF

    Abstract:   The BAL z = 3.91 quasar's high Fe/O ratio has led to a reexamination of big bang's spacetime expansion postulate and the discovery that it predicts a CBR redshift of z > 36000 instead of the widely accepted z ~ 1000. This result leads an expansion-predicted CBR temperature of only T = 0.08 K, which is contradicted by the experimental TCBR = 2.73 K. Contrary to long-held belief, these results strongly suggest that the F-L expanding spacetime paradigm, with its expansion redshifts, is not the correct relativistic description of the universe. This conclusion agrees with the earlier finding (gr-qc/9806061) that the universe is relativistically governed by the Einstein static spacetime solution of the field equations, not the F-L solution. Disproof of expansion redshifts removes the only support for the Cosmological Principle, thus showing that the spherical symmetry of the cosmos demanded by the Hubble redshift relation can no longer be attributed to the universe being the same everywhere. The Cosmological Principle is flawed. Instead of the universe being both homogeneous and isotropic, instead it is only isotropic about a nearby universal Center. These results suggest that the new Cosmic Center Universe model, based on Einstein's static spacetime solution of the field equations, deserves the attention of the scientific community. One significant advantage of the new model is that it restores conservation of energy to physics, in stark contrast to the big bang, which involved gargantuan nonconservation of CBR energy losses amounting to more than thirty million times the baryonic mass of the visible universe (gr-qc/9806061).

  5. Gentry, R. V. 2003. "New Cosmic Center Universe Model Matches Eight of Big Bang's Major Predictions Without the F-L Paradigm." CERN Preprint, Ext-2003-022. PDF

    Abstract:   Accompanying disproof of the F-L expansion paradigm eliminates the basis for expansion redshifts, which in turn eliminates the basis for the Cosmological Principle. The universe is not the same everywhere. Instead the spherical symmetry of the cosmos demanded by the Hubble redshift relation proves the universe is isotropic about a nearby universal Center. This is the foundation of the relatively new Cosmic Center Universe model, which accounts for, explains, or predicts: (i) The Hubble redshift relation, (ii) a CBR redshift relation that fits all current CBR measurements, (iii) the recently discovered velocity dipole distribution of radiogalaxies, (iv) the well-known time dilation of SNe Ia light curves, (v) the Sunyaev-Zeldovich thermal effect, (vi) Olber's paradox, (vii) a modied Tolman relation, (viii) SN dimming for z < 1, and for z > 1 an enhanced brightness that fits SN 1997ff measurements, (ix) the existence of extreme redshift (z > 10) objects which, when observed, will further distinguish it from the big bang. The CCU model also plausibly explains the z = 3.91 BAL quasar's high Fe/O ratio which so directly contradicts big bang's F-L paradigm. This leads to CCU's prediction that similar high-ratio, high-z quasars which falsify big bang's nucleosynthesis time line will also be discovered.

  6. 10 Papers submitted to arXiv on February 28, 2001:
    • Gentry, R. V. 2001. "Is the Scientific Community in for a Big Surprise about the Big Bang?" PDF

      Abstract:   Cosmologists who have promoted the Hubble redshift relation and the 2.7K Cosmic Blackbody Radiation as virtual proof of the big bang have led the rest of the scientific community to consider it one of the outstanding scientific triumphs of all time. Witness, for example, the recent claim that the big bang is bang on because CBR measurements at z = 2.34 bracket big bang's prediction of T = 9.1K. Despite this, some of history's greatest surprises have occurred when apparently well-established scientific theories were overturned after long-overlooked critical testing revealed flaws in their cornerstone postulates. In this instance the scientific community at large has been unaware of cosmologists' failure to verify big bang's cornerstone postulates. This lapse may yet become known as one of the greatest faux pas in the history of science because this series of papers reveals that big bang's cornerstone postulates have always been seriously flawed. Disproof of big-bang cosmology directs attention to GENESIS, a new model of the cosmos that has a nearby universal Center, one whose astrophysical framework is equally "bang on" because its T (z) = 2.73 (1 + z) prediction duplicates big bang's predictions at both z = 2.34 and z = 0, plus accounting for the Hubble relation, but with Doppler and gravitational redshifts instead of F-L expansion redshifts.

    • Gentry, R. V. 2001. "Is the Scientific Community Aware of the Extraordinary Confusion over Big Bang's Expansion Redshifts?" PDF

      Abstract:   The scientific community widely understands that expansion redshifts are the centerpiece of big-bang cosmology. What is generally unknown is the widespread confusion in the ranks of cosmologists as to exactly what they are. A minority equate them with Doppler shifts due to actual recession. A majority, however, claim: (i) ". . . the [expansion] redshift does not really have anything to do with velocities at all in cosmology," (ii) ". . . it is common but misleading to convert a large redshift to a recession velocity using the special-relativistic formula 1 + z = (1 + v/c) / (1 - v/c) ," and (iii) "The truth is that expansion redshifts are totally different from Doppler redshifts, and the velocities catalogued by astronomers are not the recession velocities used in the velocity-distance law." Has the scientific community been victimized by astronomers as the foregoing implies? Or is it instead that the expansion redshift concept is flawed? This paper shows it's the latter, that it was accepted without ever being tested. In fact modern physics knows nothing of expansion's redshifts and their presumed origin due to expanding space rather than Doppler recession.

    • Gentry, R. V. 2001. "Galaxies Point to Flaws in Big Bang's Expanding-Balloon Illustration and to Smoking Gun Signatures of GENESIS." PDF

      Abstract:   Big bang's pennies-on-an-expanding balloon illustration depicts ever increasing separation of galaxies predicated on the assumption that the universe is governed by Friedmann-Lemaitre spacetime expansion. There is a significant contradiction connected with the effects of this assumption. It concerns how spacetime expansion is portrayed to interact with gravity. On one hand, clusters of galaxies are pictured as separating to increasingly greater distances despite their large gravitational attraction. On the other hand, for some mysterious reason expansion is said to be unable to cause galaxies themselves to increase in size even though the gravitational attraction within them is smaller than between clusters. Analysis shows that if expansion ever existed it would have caused continuous, uniform expansion of all matter, in which case galaxies would not have formed. Thus the existence of galaxies provides two powerful Smoking Gun Signatures, the first being that our universe knows nothing of big bang's spacetime expansion and, second, that the GENESIS of our universe must have occurred far differently than modern cosmology has ever envisioned.

    • Gentry, R. V. 2001. "How Will the Scientific Community React to Big Bang's Vast Nonconservation-of-Energy Losses?" PDF

      Abstract:   In 1936 Hubble expressed his concern about astronomical redshifts and energy conservation: "Obviously since the product [energy × wavelength] remains constant, redshifts, by increasing wavelengths, must reduce the energy in the quanta. Any plausible interpretation of redshifts must account for the loss of energy." The scientific community rightly expects that big-bang cosmology resolved this concern consistent with energy conservation. Surprisingly, this did not happen. Instead, cosmologists exempted the big bang from energy conservation, but without saying how much was lost. This paper shows that, since t = 1 second after the big bang, expansion redshifting of CBR photons would have resulted in nonconservation-of-energy losses amounting to at least thirty million times the mass of the visible universe; moreover, losses continue at the rate of about a galactic mass every millennium. These results prove the big bang fails to match the physics of the real universe, that its expansion redshift hypothesis is fatally flawed, and hence that the big bang never possessed the qualifications necessary for being classified as a modern scientific theory.

    • Gentry, R. V. 2001. "Relativistic Operation of the GPS Exposes the Fatal Flaw in Big Bang's Cornerstone Expansion Postulate." PDF

      Abstract:   Twentieth century cosmologists mistakenly interpreted several apparent agreements with big bang's predictions as a sufficient condition that the big bang was a valid physical theory. In fact, it was only a necessary condition. This oversight led cosmologists to accept big bang's cornerstone expansion postulate without testing it. Indeed, such was their confidence that the big bang continued to be promoted even while contradictions presented by the relativistic operation of the GPS were ignored. That operation long ago showed unambiguously that the universe is relativistically formatted in accord with the Schwarzschild static spacetime solution of the field equations, not the Friedmann-Lemaitre expanding spacetime solution. That one of the preeminent theories of science is now discovered to have fatal flaws in its cornerstone postulate is a circumstance that is unequaled in modern times. It may yet become known as one of the greatest faux pas in the history of science. And it raises the question of whether other prominent modern scientific theories likewise have undetected flaws in their cornerstone postulates.

    • Gentry, R. V. 2001. "Ultimate Disproof of the Big Bang Cosmos from Its Bizarre Prediction that Photons Are Permanently Inscribed with H's Value at Time of Origin." PDF

      Abstract:   A noted cosmologist has utilized big bang's expanding spacetime redshift expression, zexp = / e − 1, and the astronomical redshift expression, z = λ / λe − 1, to obtain an expression for the predicted present rate of photon wavelength change induced by expansion, here denoted by ( / dt)exp. When this expression is simplified in terms of the values of H, the present value of the Hubble constant, and He, its value at the time of emission of photons from distant galaxies, there results an expression showing the present rate of photon wavelength change depends on both the present value of the Hubble constant, as well as its value at the time of emission in distant galaxies, namely, ( / dt)exp = Hλ Heλe. This bizarre result requires two things: First, because of big bang's homogeneity assumption, all photons in the universe must be simultaneously undergoing the changes specified by this expression; this is nothing less than on-going, instantaneous action-at-a-distance all throughout the universe's thirty-billion-lightyear diameter. Second, the fact that it requires not only individual photons be initially imprinted with H's value, corresponding to their respective times of origin, but also that this imprint should determine the rate of present wavelength expansion is proof that the expansion hypothesis has always stood in contradiction to all of modern physics.

    • Gentry, R. V. 2001. "Discovery of a Nearby Universal Center Is the Smoking Gun Signature of GENESIS that Overturns Big Bang's Cosmological Principle." PDF

      Abstract:   Discovery of flaws in the expansion hypothesis reported in Parts 2 and 5 has led to the additional discovery of astronomical proof of a nearby universal Center. In particular, Part 5's disproof of spacetime expansion invalidates explaining the Hubble redshift relation in terms of expansion redshifts, thereby exposing the Cosmological Principle as a fallacious concept. Without this Principle it is now evident that the spherical symmetry dictated by the Hubble relation must now be seen as proof of the existence of a nearby universal Center. This conclusion is overwhelmingly supported by the Galaxy also being at the center of the Gamma Ray Burster distribution, as well as by the unequivocal implications of certain cosmic inhomogeneities which have thus far received little attention, specifically meaning definite peaks in certain quasar redshift distributions. Confirmation of the New Redshift Interpretation's postulate of a nearby universal Center validates its explanation of the Hubble redshift relation and the 2.7K CBR, thus explaining why the NRI has been adopted as the astrophysical framework of GENESIS.

    • Gentry, R. V. 2001. "GENESIS Is Strongly Affirmed because Its (m, z),(∆θ, z) and Apparent Brightness Relations Are Consistent with Observations." PDF

      Abstract:   This paper shows the GENESIS astrophysical framework accounts for: (i) the Hubble redshift-magnitude relation, (ii) the galactic angular size observations for low redshift galaxies (iii) the near-constant median angular size of extended and compact radio sources for higher redshifts, (iv) the z 1 SNe Ia evidence for an accelerating universe, as well as reproducing, for z < 1, big bang's Tolman (1 + z)−4 dependence for the bolometric intensity, and its (1 + z)−3 dependence for the specific intensity. However, for z > 1 the apparent brightness for GENESIS varies as (1 + z)−1 (1 + zdoppler)−2, in contrast to big bang's (1 + z)−3 prediction. This difference leads to the expectation that galaxies with much higher redshifts (z 10) will, on the average, appear considerably more luminous than expected when using big bang's predictions. Moreover, since redshifts for celestial objects can increase without limit in the GENESIS model as r c / √2H, then astronomers searching for very high-redshift galaxies, quasars, supernovae, and GRBs, should be alert to the possibility of detecting astronomical objects with extremely high redshifts, meaning those higher — and conceivably much higher — than fifty.

    • Gentry, R. V. 2001. "Disproof of Big-Bang Cosmology Points to Seven Smoking Gun Signatures of GENESIS' Astrophysical Framework." PDF

      Abstract:   Earlier papers in this series have exposed major flaws in big bang's spacetime expansion hypothesis, effectively falsifying all aspects of big bang cosmology and its explanations of the Hubble relation, the 2.7K Cosmic Blackbody Radiation (CBR), the Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect, and Olber's paradox, to name a few. The fictitious nature of big bang's explanations of these phenomena requires a major revision in our perception of the cosmos, one that would bring order and a new understanding of these phenomena out of the chaos of big bang's collapse. A new model of the cosmos is at hand to do just that. Indeed, the fit to the new model is so unequivocal that all the aforementioned phenomena; namely, (i) Galactic recession from a nearby universal Center, as evidenced by the Hubble redshift relation, (ii) the 2.7K CBR, its temperature variation with redshift, and (iii) its proof of the existence of an absolute reference frame, (iv) the Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect, (v) Olber's paradox, (vi) SNe Ia confirmation of GENESIS' vacuum gravity universe, and (vii) the (1 + z)−1 time dilation of SNe and GRB light curves, are all Smoking Gun Signatures of GENESIS' astrophysical framework of the universe.

    • Gentry, R. V. 2001. "The Absence of Pop III Stars and Prior Discovery of Short Half-Life Extinct Primordial Radioactivity Disprove Big Bang's Nucleosynthesis Scenario and Substantiates GENESIS' Rapid Creation Postulate." PDF

      Abstract:   Big-bang cosmology predicts that an abundance of first generation, Population III stars should have formed after the initial nucleogenesis singularity. In theory these stars were composed mainly of H and He, with only a trace of heavier elements. Decades of astronomical searches have failed to locate any that can be definitely identified with these characteristics, thus refuting big bang's prediction for the origin of the universe's two dominant chemical elements. Disproof of big bang's nucleosynthesis scenario for the origin of all chemical elements comes from the heretofore rarely acknowledged discovery of primordial short half-life extinct natural radioactivity in Earth's primordial rocks. This discovery shows (i) the chemical elements of which the earth is composed did not originate in supernova nucleosynthetic reactions and (ii) the primordial earth formed very rapidly rather than being the product of slow evolutionary change over geological time. These results, plus the failure of big bang's spacetime expansion hypothesis, point to the need of a new model of the cosmos.

  7. Gentry, R. V. 1998. "The Genuine Cosmic Rosetta." Los Alamos National Laboratory E-Print arXive: gr-gc/9806061. PDF

    Abstract:   Reexamination of general relativistic experimental results shows the universe is governed by Einstein's static-spacetime general relativity instead of Friedmann-Lemaitre expanding-spacetime general relativity. The absence of expansion redshifts in a static-spacetime universe suggests a reevaluation of the present cosmology is needed.

For any of the above that are in PDF format, use Adobe Acrobat Reader.

© 2011